fbpx
Experiencing a Breach?

Preemptive Security

Red Teaming
XDR
EDR

Breach Investigation

Vulnerability Assessment
Penetration Testing
Infrastructure Security Assessment
Application Security Assessment
Compromise Assessment

Compliance Accreditation and Consulting

Information Security & IT Audits
Secure Source Code Review
Security Architecture Review & Design

Premises Security

Datacenter Security Review
Physical Security Review
Risk Assessment

Managed SOC Services

SIEM Solution
SOAR
TI Platform
IR Platform
IOCs Platform

Enhanced Security Solutions

Ethical Hacking
Continuous Security Monitoring
Threat Intelligence
Malware Analysis

Platform Overview

Novasecuris – Clycn AI

Clycn AI – Overview

Managed SOC Services

Clycn AI Console

How it works?

Technology Alliances

Our Technology partners

Substructure

Clycn AI

Anticipating risks, securing your future.

Why Clycn AI?

Technological Singularity Clycn.ai SIEM, SOAR, TIP, IRP and IOCs

Managed SOC Services Platform

Clycn AI SIEM
Clycn AI SOAR
Clycn AI TIP
Clycn AI IRP
Clycn AI IOCs

Cyberpedia

Cyberpedia

Dedicated to providing comprehensive information, articles, and guides.

FAQs

Your concerns?

We hear you

NEXT-GEN VS TRADITIONAL ENDPOINT PROTECTION: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Cybersecurity threats are changing at an alarming rate in the modern digital ecosystem, necessitating ongoing defensive strategy adaptation on the part of enterprises. Endpoint protection, which defends individual devices like laptops and smartphones, is an essential part of an all-encompassing cybersecurity system. However, the initiation of next-generation endpoint security products has spurred discussion over their effectiveness to more conventional methods.

Traditional Endpoint Defense

Endpoint Protection

Since decades, the cornerstone of cybersecurity has been an antivirus software along with other endpoint protection remedies. These solutions utilize signature-based detection approaches to find and block malware and suspicious intrusions. Software that matches files and activities to a database of known threats can discover and neutralize well-known attack routes using signature-based detection.

Advantages

Verified Past Performance

Traditional endpoint security technologies have a long history of mitigating recognized malware threats.

Negative Outliers Minimal

Since signature-based detection methods provide fewer false positives, innocuous files are less likely to be flagged as dangerous.

Resource Efficiency

Because traditional antivirus software utilizes fewer resources; it is better suited for traditional technologies or devices with lower processing capacity.

Drawbacks

Limited Protection Against Zero-Day Exploit Attacks

Signature-based detection methods are ineffective against zero-day attacks, which exploit vulnerabilities that have not yet been identified.

Incapable of Recognizing Complex Dangers

Advanced malware variants that may evade traditional endpoint protection measures include fileless and polymorphic malware.

Reliance on Frequent Updates

Organizations must keep up with the most recent malware signatures since traditional solutions need to be updated in order to be effective against new threats.

Next-Gen Endpoint Protection

Next-generation endpoint protection solutions represent a paradigm shift in cybersecurity because of its cutting-edge technologies like machine learning, behavioral analysis, and endpoint detection and response (EDR) capabilities to tackle modern-day cyberattacks. The objective of these systems is to provide proactive real-time security against cyberattacks, such as targeted threats and zero-day vulnerabilities.

Advantages

Examination of Conduct

Through the use of behavioral analytic techniques, next-generation systems can identify and mitigate anomalous behavior and reveal undetected threats. 

Next-gen solutions detect possible threats by analyzing the behavior of files, processes, and network activity rather than relying just on signatures. These systems analyze various events, including file executions, registry changes, and network connections, in order to detect unusual behavior that might point to an intrusion. These solutions categorize patterns and enhance detection over time using machine learning methods. 

Machine Learning

Through the use of machine learning algorithms, next-generation endpoint security systems may adapt and develop over time, increasing their ability to recognize and neutralize new threats.

Enhanced Visibility and Reaction

EDR capabilities enable businesses get deeper insights into security vulnerabilities and respond swiftly to potential breaches by lessening the impact of cyberattacks.

Drawbacks

Elevated False Positive Rates

The application of behavioral analysis and machine learning algorithms may result in increased false positive rates, adding to the workload for security professionals in terms of investigating and triaging alarms.

Resource Intensity

Next-generation endpoint security solutions may require more processing power than classic antivirus software, propelling an impact on system performance.

Cost

The cost of implementing and maintaining next-generation endpoint protection solutions may be prohibitive for certain businesses, particularly smaller ones with more limited resources. There are clear benefits and drawbacks to traditional and next-generation endpoint protection systems in the ongoing fight against cyber threats. The decision between next-generation and traditional endpoint security comes down to a number of variables, including the organization’s risk tolerance, available funds, and resource limitations. Certain entities could choose to employ a hybrid strategy, merging aspects of both technologies to get a well-rounded and all-encompassing cybersecurity stance.

Statistics & Projections

According to Global Market Insights, the forecasted market value of traditional endpoint security industry is more than 15 billion dollars in 2026.

According to Research Nester, the highest market share for endpoint security will belong to North America (33%) by 2035

Frequently Asked Questions

Q.1. How does Next-Gen Endpoint Protection leverage advanced technologies to improve threat detection?

Next-Gen Endpoint Protection uses artificial intelligence and machine learning to ameliorate threat detection. It examines vast amounts of data, looks for trends, and identifies possible dangers. Next-Gen Endpoint Protection powered by AI is similar to an intelligent guard that can swiftly identify threats, lower false alarms, and reinforce the system. 

Q.2. What are the advantages of Next-Gen Endpoint Protection?

Next-Gen Endpoint Security provides several benefits: It fortifies cybersecurity defenses, lowers false alarms, identifies novel attacks, and improves threat detection.

Q.3. What is difference between Traditional Endpoint Protection and Next Gen?

Traditional Endpoint Protection relies on known patterns and signatures to detect threats, while Next-Gen Endpoint Protection uses advanced technologies like AI and machine learning to analyze data, identify patterns, and detect threats. 

Q.4. How does Traditional Endpoint Protection compare in terms of resource usage and impact on system performance?

Traditional endpoint protection can have a higher resource usage and impacts system performance compared to Next-Gen Endpoint Protection.